Before I had my son, I spent two years working with children with disabilities. I learne

Before I had my son, I spent two years working with children with disabilities. I learned that shouting and threats of punishment would result in a disaster. Coming up against their behaviour could only make the job harder and their behaviour more extreme. I found something that worked, though.

There was a very naughty boy in the nursery and a teacher who was generally very confident with the children was asked to take charge of him. One day the boy joined a session in the room next to mine. His appearance created an atmosphere of tension. He spent the entire session running around, hitting and kicking, and destroying property.

I was in the craft room working with some other children when my co-worker told me that this boy’s teacher was in tears, and could not get control of the situation. As we were talking, the boy ran in. I told my co-worker that I would take care of him.

I closed the door. He was full of energy, throwing things around and making a huge mess. But I could see that he was doing all these to annoy me. He needed connection, and this was the only way he knew how to ask for it. So I sat back down and kept quiet. Then he slowed down and began making a rocket. I talked to him about it. We continued like this for a few minutes before I slipped into the conversation:

“So what happened today?”

It was purely a question, no blame or anger in my tone. I believe that if I had criticized him, the gate that was slowly opening would have shut firmly closed. He told me that the teacher didn’t let him do what he knew well due to safety but asked him to do what he disliked. He also admitted that he had enjoyed making her run around and saw it as a game. I explained that his teacher had not seen it as a game and was very upset. This again was stated simply as a fact. I suggested that next time he had a session, he talk about what he hoped to do at the start, which might be easier for everyone. He agreed and was quiet for a moment. Then he looked at me with tears in his eyes before quietly asking if he could go to find his teacher to apologize.

51. The boy made trouble for his teacher because he ______.

A. was accused of destroying property

B. was told not to yell at other children

C. was made to do things against his will

D. was blamed for creating an air of tension

52. Why didn’t the author do anything about the boy’s bad behavior at first?

A. She didn’t want to make it worse.

B. She didn’t mind the huge mess at all.

C. She was tired of shouting and threats.

D. She hadn’t thought of a coping strategy.

53. The author managed to get the boy to talk to her by ______.

A. playing games with him

B. giving him a good suggestion

C. describing his teacher’s feelings

D. avoiding making critical remarks

54. Why did the boy have tears in his eyes in the end?

A. He was sorry about his reputation.

B. He was regretful about his behavior.

C. He was fearful of the author’s warning.

D. He was sad for the author’s misunderstanding.

答案

51. C   52. A   53. D   54. B     

相关题目

下列实验中所选用的仪器或实验基本操作合理的是 ①用l0mL量
下列实验中所选用的仪器或实验基本操作合理的是 ①用l0mL量筒量取5.2 mL稀硫酸;    ②用酒精洗涤粘有硫粉的试管:  ③用托盘天平称量10.1 g氯化钠
人们对种植转基因农作物利弊有激烈的争论,假设正方认为
人们对种植转基因农作物利弊有激烈的争论,假设正方认为种植转基因农作物对人类是有利的,反方认为种植转基因农作物是有潜在风险的。下列观点
图是人体反射弧的示意图,请据图回答,如果A代表的手部皮
图是人体反射弧的示意图,请据图回答,如果A代表的手部皮肤内的感受器,则神经冲动的传导方向是 A.A→B→C→D→E              B.E→D→C→
下列说法正确的是( ) ①标准状况下,6.02×1023个分子所占的
下列说法正确的是( ) ①标准状况下,6.02×1023个分子所占的体积约是22.4 L ②0.5 mol H2所占体积为11.2 L ③标准状况下,1 mol H2O的体积为22.4 L ④标准状况下
波在传播过程中,正确的说法是(    ) A.介质中的质点随
波在传播过程中,正确的说法是(    ) A.介质中的质点随波迁移                                B.波源的振动能量随波传递C.介质中质
碱式碳酸铜广泛用于制油漆颜料、烟火、杀虫剂、催化剂、
碱式碳酸铜广泛用于制油漆颜料、烟火、杀虫剂、催化剂、其他铜盐和固体荧光粉激活剂等,也用于种子处理及作杀菌剂等。某化学兴趣小组在实验室
溶液在稀释前后保持不变的是 A.溶质的质量分数         
溶液在稀释前后保持不变的是 A.溶质的质量分数                                       B.溶质的质量 C.溶液的质量             
铝在空气中能够稳定存在的原因是A.铝的活泼性差      
铝在空气中能够稳定存在的原因是A.铝的活泼性差                            B.铝的还原性差C.铝与氧气不反应               

最新题目