I like my close friends a lot, and yet, on an almost daily basis, they shocked me. I have a friend who thinks voting is a waste of time; I have another friend who never takes any arrangement to meet at a given time and place seriously.
It’s generally held that friends are people with whom we choose to develop relationships because we find their personalities agreeable, or similar to our own, and yet experience regularly contradicts this. What is a friend, really? All that one can safely say is that a friend is someone one likes and wishes to see again.
The truth is that we don’t know our friends. Numerous studies show that we tend to assume our friends agree with us more than they really do. The striking part is that the problem doesn’t appear to lessen as a friendship deepens when the researchers Michael Gill and Bill Swann questioned students sharing rooms, they found that, as time passed, people became even more confident in the accuracy of their judgements about the other, and yet, in reality, the judgements grew no more accurate. Two people might become dear friends, yet remain ignorant about vast areas of each other’s inner lives.
This seems strange, until you consider, that many of the benefits that friendship provides don’t necessarily depend on perfect familiarity; they come from something closer to reliability. Friendship may be less about being drawn to someone’s personality than about finding someone willing to keep you company, or lend an ear. A friend provides the “social-identity support” we desire. You needn’t be a close match with someone, nor deeply familiar with their mind. And once a friendship has begun, you want to like it, if only to confirm that you made the right decision. We don’t want to know everything about our friends. We don’t base friendships on what we learn about people; we decide what to learn about people, and what to ignore, based on having decided to be friends.
Perhaps there’s something moving about viewing friendship as an agreement to keep each other company, ignore each other’s faults and not probe (刨根问底) too deeply in ways that might weaken the friendship. Perhaps a true friend is someone who doesn’t ask many awkward questions.
55. Why does the author tell the stories of his two friends in the first paragraph?
A. To provide background information.
B. To introduce the topic of the passage.
C. To stress the importance of friendship.
D. To show the difference between friends.
56. The underlined word “they” in paragraph 4 refers to __________.
A. friends
B. judgements
C. researchers
D. benefits
57. It can be concluded from the passage that __________.
A. close friends usually know each other in depth
B. real friends are people you like but don’t wish to see often
C. we do not necessarily share personalities with close friends
D. the longer we stay with friends, the more accurately we judge them
58. Which statement about friends will the author probably accept?
A. Stay friends but keep a distance.
B. It takes a long time to grow an old friend.
C. Real friends will tell you when your face is dirty.
D. True friends know all about you and still like you.