More than a century ago, the composer and bandleader John Philip Sousa warned that techno

More than a century ago, the composer and bandleader John Philip Sousa warned that technology would destroy music, who said, “These talking machines are going to ruin the artistic development of music in this country. When I was a boy … in front of every house in the summer evenings you would find young people together singing the songs of the day or the old songs. Today you hear these terrible machines going night and day. We will not have a vocal cord (声带) left.”

Music has greatly changed in the past hundred years, which has been everywhere in our world: rivers of digital melody flow on the Internet or on disc; MP3 players with forty thousand songs can be put in a back pocket or a purse. Yet, for most of us, music is no longer something we do ourselves, or even watch other people do in front of us. It has become a radically virtual medium, an art without a face.

Ever since Edison invented the phonograph cylinder(留声机), people have been assessing what the medium of recording has done for and to the art of music. Sousa was a spokesman for the party of doom; in the opposite corner are the utopians(乌托邦), who argue that technology has not imprisoned music but liberated it. Before Edison came along, Beethoven’s symphonies could be heard only in select concert halls. Now the recordings carry the man from Bonn to the corners of the earth. Glenn Gould, after renouncing live performance in 1964, predicted that within the century the public concert would disappear into the electronic air.

Having discovered much of my favorite music through LPs and CDs, I am not about to join Sousa’s party. Modern urban environments are often so soulless or ugly that I’m grateful for the humanizing touch of electronic sound. But neither can I accept Gould’s slashing futurism. I want to be aware of technology’s effects, positive and negative. Fortunately, scholars and critics have been methodically exploring this terrain for many decades, trying to figure out exactly what happens when we listen to music with no musicians in the room.

9. The first paragraph is intended to        .

 A. defend an argument          B. make a prediction

 C. criticize an attitude          D. summarized a viewpoint

10. The author’s attitude towards the recorded music may best be described as        .

 A. dissatisfied     B. defensive    C. optimistic     D. objective

11. The underlined word “terrain” in the last paragraph most nearly means       .

 A. region         B. subject      C. land         D. distinction

12. The primary purpose of the passage is to       .

 A. explain different attitudes of scholars and critics

B. defend the view of one group from the criticism of another

 C. advocate an unexpected solution to a pressing problem

 D. present the key issues in an ongoing debate

答案

DDBD

相关题目

下列选项排序正确的是 (3分)(      )          
下列选项排序正确的是 (3分)(      )                                                    我不去想是否能够成功,  
下列实验中说法正确的是     A.蒸发操作中,应使混合物
下列实验中说法正确的是     A.蒸发操作中,应使混合物中的水未完全蒸干时,就停止加热     B.将饱和FeCl3溶液滴入煮沸的NaOH溶液中,从而制得Fe
已知a>0,集合A={x||x+2|<a},B={x|ax>1},若A∩B≠,则实数a的取值
已知a>0,集合A={x||x+2|<a},B={x|ax>1},若A∩B≠,则实数a的取值范围是(    ) A.(2,+∞)                                 B.(0,1)C.(0,1)∪(2,+
设命题P:关于x的不等式a>1(a>0且a≠1)为{x|-a<x<2a};命
设命题P:关于x的不等式a>1(a>0且a≠1)为{x|-a<x<2a};命题Q:y=lg(ax-x+a)的定义域为R。如果P或Q为真,P且Q为假,求a的取值范围
马克思和恩格斯在吸收人类优秀文化成果和总结欧洲工人运
马克思和恩格斯在吸收人类优秀文化成果和总结欧洲工人运动经验的基础上,创立了科学社会主义理论。阐述此理论的文献是(       ) A.《权利法
如右图所示电路,已知电池组的总内电阻r=1Ω,外电路电阻R
如右图所示电路,已知电池组的总内电阻r=1Ω,外电路电阻R=5Ω,电压表的示数U=2.5V,则电池组的电动势E为(    )A.2.0V B.2.5VC.3.0VD.3.5V 
(09年衡阳八中月考)(8分)如图所示,一块涂有炭黑玻璃
(09年衡阳八中月考)(8分)如图所示,一块涂有炭黑玻璃板,质量为2kg,在拉力F的作用下,由静止开始竖直向上运动。一个装有水平振针的振动频率
我们已经知道,肺活量是一个人做最大吸气后再做最大呼气
我们已经知道,肺活量是一个人做最大吸气后再做最大呼气所呼出的气体的体积,单位是毫升(mL).肺活量是身体机能的重要指标之一,对青少年的成

最新题目