Could your cellphone give you cancer? Whether it could or not, some people are worrying ab

Could your cellphone give you cancer? Whether it could or not, some people are worrying about the possibility that phones, powerlines and wi-fi (路由器) could be responsible for a range of illnesses, from rashes to brain tumours.

For example, Camilla Rees, 48, a former investment banker in the US, moved out of her apartment in San Francisco because of the radiation coming from next door. Rees told the Los Angeles Times that when her neighbors moved in and installed a wi-fi router she lost her ability to think clearly. “I would wake up dizzy in the morning. I’d fall to the floor. I had to leave to escape that nightmare,” she said. Since then, she’s been on a campaign against low-level electromagnetic fields, or EMFs(低频电磁场).

And she’s not alone. Millions of people say they suffer from headaches, depression, nausea and rashes when they’re too close to cellphones or other sources of EMFs.

Although the World Health Organization has officially declared that EMFs seem to pose little threat, governments are still concerned. In fact, last April, the European Parliament called for countries to take steps to reduce exposure to EMFs. The city of San Francisco and the state of Maine are currently considering requiring cancer-warning labels on cellphones.

If these fears are reasonable, then perhaps we should all be worried about the amount of time we spend talking on our phones or plugging into wi-fi hotpots.

Some say there is evidence to support the growing anxieties. David Carpenter, a professor of environmental health sciences at the University at Albany, in New York, thinks there’s a greater than 95% chance that power lines can cause childhood leukemia. Also there’s a greater than 90% chance that cellphones can cause brain tumours.

But others believe these concerns are unreasonable paranoia (猜疑). Dr Martha Linet, the head of radiation epidemiology at the US National Cancer Institute, has looked at the same research as Carpenter but has reached a different conclusion. “I don’t support warning labels for cellphones,” said Linet. “We don't have the evidence that there’s much danger.”

Studies so far suggest a weak connection between EMFs and illness — so weak that it might not exist at all. A multinational investigation of cellphones and brain cancer, in 13 countries outside the US, has been underway for several years. It’s funded in part by the European Union, in part by a cellphone industry group.

According to Robert Park, a professor of physics at the University of Maryland in the US, the magnetic waves aren’t nearly powerful enough to break apart DNA, which is how known threats, such as UV rays and X-rays, cause cancer.

Perhaps it’s just psychological. Some experts find that the electro-sensitivity syndrome seems to be similar to chemical sensitivity syndrome, which is a condition that’s considered to be psychological.

Whether EMFs are harmful or not, a break in the countryside, without the cellphone, would probably be good for all of us.

 

Title: Could cellphones give you cancer?

Key points

Supporting details

Cellphones are (71)______ to use

● Some people think it (72)______ for cellphones to cause cancer.

● Camilla Rees got ill after his neighbor installed a wi-fi router.

● Millions of people have the (73) _______ problems as Camilla.

● Some evidence supports people’s anxieties.

Cellphones are safe

to use

    

● Some believe that these concerns are just paranoia.

● So far, studies show that there isn’t much (74)______ between EMFs and illness.

● Robert Park thinks that the magnetic waves aren’t powerful enough to (75)_______ DNA.

● It’s just for psychological (76)_______ that people feel ill when they use cellphones.

Attitudes and (77)______

● Some governments are (78)_______ about the safety of cellphones or EMFs.

● The author thinks that we should(79)_______ the chance of talking on the phone or spend more time in the(80)_____ areas without cellphones.

答案

71. dangerous/harmful   72. possible   73. same   74. connection    75. destroy

    76. reasons    77. suggestions    78. concerned     79. reduce     80. rural

相关题目

某银行一年共发放贷款50000万元人民币,平均年利率是7%,在
某银行一年共发放贷款50000万元人民币,平均年利率是7%,在这一年中,共吸收存款55000万元,平均年利率3%,中间结算业务收入400万元,在这一年中银行
 中东地区最贫乏的自然资源是(     )A.石油资源     
 中东地区最贫乏的自然资源是(     )A.石油资源         B.煤炭资源         C.天然气资源              D.水资源
一颗使用电推进系统——氙离子推进器的欧洲“GOCE”卫星因
一颗使用电推进系统——氙离子推进器的欧洲“GOCE”卫星因燃料耗尽,在地球大气层中解体,其残骸于2013年11月10日午夜着陆到地球表面.关于“GOCE”卫
已知双曲线的左、右焦点分别为F1,F2,在左支上过F1的弦AB的
已知双曲线的左、右焦点分别为F1,F2,在左支上过F1的弦AB的长为5.若2a=8,那么△ABF2的周长是(    )A.16                B.18            
据报道,某省十几个城市玉米患“粗缩病”,该病是由灰飞
据报道,某省十几个城市玉米患“粗缩病”,该病是由灰飞虱传播“粗缩病”病毒引起的病害。关于“粗缩病”病毒叙述错误的是( ) A.“粗缩病”病
把烧红的铁块放入水中,会听到吱吱的响声并看到 “白气”
把烧红的铁块放入水中,会听到吱吱的响声并看到 “白气”,这现象(     )    A、液化        B、汽化     C、先熔化后汽化        D、
颜色不褪去的是A.酸性高锰钾溶液加入亚硫酸溶液      
颜色不褪去的是A.酸性高锰钾溶液加入亚硫酸溶液          B.品红溶液中通入二氧化硫C. 鲜花通入干燥的氯气                   D.溴水通
若阿伏加德罗常数的数值用NA表示,下列说法正确的是 A.标
若阿伏加德罗常数的数值用NA表示,下列说法正确的是 A.标准状况下,2.24 L氦气所含原子数为0.2NA   B.1.8 gNH4+离子所含质子数为NA C.22.4 LHCl溶于水,

最新题目